| IGEL
Fellow Bernard David’s Personal Account of the Vice
President Task Force Meeting
February
27, 2009 BY BERNARD J. DAVID
Senior Fellow, Initiative for Global Environmental
Leadership at Penn/Wharton
Vice
President Biden started the session with introductory remarks.
He stated that the goal of this session was to discuss green
jobs as a part of a larger dialogue about job creation for
the middle class.
The
Vice President said that the American Recovery Act of 2009
included $11 billion to build smart grids throughout the United
States—3 thousand miles of new high tech transmission
lines, to start; 40 million new smart meters with the hopes
that they would encourage businesses to use smart meters.
$5 billion is set aside to make housing more efficient. And
$500 million to train workers in such areas as energy audits—with
real training, where they would be retrained periodically.
Green
jobs, the Vice President pointed out, pay 10-20% more than
other similar skill-based jobs. By greening the infrastructure,
energy costs are also reduced. And, the overall benefit is
a cleaner environment.
The
Vice President introduced the other cabinet members who were
there—the Secretaries of Agriculture, Education, Energy,
Labor, Housing and Urban Development, and Transportation.
He
pointed out that there was already a collaborative effort
between HUD and Energy involving the retrofit of urban housing.Senators
Specter and Casey gave remarks as Senator Specter was lauded
for his support of the America Recovery Act of 2009. Vice
President Biden acknowledged that the Act would not have passed
but for Senator Specter’s support.
After
remarks from two of Pennsylvania’s Congressman, where
Congressman Fattah discussed the $6 billion in block grants
that the Federal government has to give out to lower energy
costs, the Vice President directed the session to the first
panel. The first panel included John Podesta, Van Jones and
Fred Krupp.
John
Podesta of the Center for American Progress discussed that
green jobs are more labor intensive and more local. He said
that energy efficiency investments are high return and low
risk. Podesta stated that there are 130 million homes in the
U.S., and 75% of them need to be retrofitted to be more energy
efficient. He said he felt that it made sense to use revolving
loan programs to fund these programs. And green job training
needed to be coordinated with this energy retrofitting effort.
Van
Jones emphasized the need to create jobs for those in the
ghetto. He said that “greening the ghetto” first
was very important. Jones showed a video that pointed out
ways to both create jobs and green cities, including a novel
business in the South Bronx called Rebuilders Source, which
resells building materials for reuse.
Fred
Krupp unveiled a new website that is tracking environmentally
friendly jobs throughout the country. It is found at: www.lesscarbonmorejobs.org
Fred spent a lot of time reviewing supply chains showing that
many jobs are created at each step of the way. In the wind
turbine business, for example, he showed that there are 8,000
parts in a wind turbine and that many of these parts were
quite simple. In their entirety, though, they can create a
lot of jobs and growth. He discussed that EDF has identified
250 different markets where there are green jobs and cited
some of them—LEDs, concentrated solar, auxiliary power
units, management of hog waste, and waste heat capture. He
cited Cree, Inc., a company in South Carolina, that manufactured
all of the color LEDs for the China Olympics. Krupp also cited
Sunrise Solar and Dowding Industries as companies which are
actually hiring.
During the question and answer, the Secretary of Agriculture
pointed out the urban reforest program is a greening program
sponsored by USDA to green urban environments.
Secretary
Chu pointed out that DOE has $5 billion for low income home
weatherization and $6.3 billion (through the cities) available
to increase energy efficiency. Chu said there weren’t
enough energy auditors available today to scale up the energy
efficiency building measures, and he asked the panel how they
would see scaling up to be done as soon as possible. (The
question was answered later, with confidence, by a private
sector businessman from Oregon, who claimed it could easily
be done and that it should start with the schools). Secretary
Chu acknowledged the collaboration with HUD and said that
there is $15 billion available for public housing retrofits.
Van
Jones responded that he felt a lot of training of talent to
do retrofits could be done in community colleges and that
the unions needed to be engaged.
Fred
acknowledged that we needed to drive private money into this
retrofit equation along with the federal money. In order to
be effective both Chu and Fred acknowledged that there needed
to be a decoupling of rates, something that I got the impression
that Chu is addressing.
The
Vice President asked what the leverage could be if the Federal
government invested $19 billion, from a multiplier effect
in the private sector. Fred Krupp estimated it to be 10 to
1; something that Secretary Chu corroborated.
Secretary
Chu pointed that ESCOs are already working in the marketplace
to reduce energy costs, now, without Federal subsidies. He
also pointed out that there was $3 billion now being targeted
to public housing authorities.
The
group acknowledged that it made sense to use public dollars
to bring in private sector funds. The group acknowledged that
innovation funds were critical, especially Secretary Chu and
Fred Krupp.
The
Secretary of Labor asked who was doing the best thinking in
this area. Van Jones responded that from a financing standard,
the Emerald Cities initiative based at MIT appeared to be
a leader.
The
Vice President pointed out that there was a dynamic tension
between getting money out quickly but doing it thoughtfully.
He pointed out the import of considering both angles, acknowledging
that this was a really hard issue. He said that the administration
would be completely transparent in its thinking and was looking
to everyone in the United States for creative approaches.
Van Jones emphasized the importance of early childhood education
in the environmental area.
The
Domestic Policy advisor asked, “what about mid-career
people who have been laid off? and what are we missing?”
No one really answered the question but it showed the openness
of this administration and called for any/all responses.
Governor
Ed Rendell started the next panel. He said that others would
comment on green job creation but he wanted to address three
things which the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania had done.
1)
Government can help create markets.
2) Government can provide incentives and investment to nurture
companies from inception through growth, and
3) The government can be a user, which helps create markets.
Governor
Rendell discussed the RPS in PA including the strongest photovoltaic
standards in the nation. Pennsylvania’s requirement
is that 18% of all of its energy is renewable by 2019. The
Governor discussed Gamesa and its presence in Pennsylvania.
He also discussed fuels and the requirements for 1 billion
gallons to come from non-fossil fuels by a date certain. Incentives.
Rendell discussed tax credits and funds which the Commonwealth
has provided – $925 million to create incentives and
$615 million for the energy investment fund. He also noted
the steps the Commonwealth has taken to conserve energy—12.5%
in three years…and help companies at every stage.
The
government as a user. Rendell discussed the coal gasification
operation which Katie McGinty brought to him several years
ago and encouraged the Commonwealth to sign a 10 year contract
with the firm for its off-take which allowed the company to
get financing. It never got approval during the previous administration
in D.C. so it didn’t happen, but Rendell cited this
as an example of how the Federal government could become a
purchaser of many green products and services, including hybrid
electric cars.
Rendell said that the government needed to lead by example
as Pennsylvania has done, requiring that 20% of all the energy
that it uses will come from green energy sources by 2010.
Rendell
confirmed that capitalism is the best system to use but the
government can help fast track (or catalyze) the development
of these industries by being a buyer.
Mayor
Nutter stated that Philadelphia will become the capital of
the green economy. He cited the many things which the Philadelphia
government is doing, inclusive of the Philadelphia green jobs
program which commences in April.
Leo
Gerard, International President of the United Steelworkers,
represented that green jobs were any jobs that improve the
quality of the environment. He said that the USW had formed
the Blue/Green Alliance, for transferring blue-collar jobs
into green collar jobs. They have been studying the topic
for a while, and he told the Vice President that they have
developed a scorecard, which will rate the job creation done
by the Vice President’s task force. Gerard also stated
the need to detoxify our buildings through the process of
dealing with energy efficiency and green jobs. Gerard stresses
that all of these programs feed into security of the country—national,
energy and economic.
The
head of the L.A. community reinvestment authority citied numerous
examples of the renewable energy standards in the DPW including
35% renewable by 2030 overall and 20% by 2015. She gave examples
of how the CRA is investing and the rate of return which drove
them: affordability of housing, green values, prevailing wages,
etc. She also stated that Cleantech LA had been formed as
a joint cooperative with businesses and government to see
what could be done to stimulate clean technology investments
and actions.
Mark
Gaitlin, a private green commercial developer from Oregon,
spoke on the economic opportunities created in the green building
space. His comments were given very confidently, and he engendered
the sense that we could implement green jobs in retrofits
or buildings in a very short time frame. It is worth reading
his testimony on the web.
As
Q and A ensued, Rendell discussed the money set aside to modernize
schools as potential to be used for energy efficiency measures.
The Secretary of HUD and Secretary Chu felt that they would
work to get money out into the system for this type of retrofitting
asap. The Vice President pointed out that at the first cabinet
meeting, Secretary Chu asked how he could get monies out of
DOE faster. The Vice President said that legal counsel was
working to find methods to do so and that he might need the
help of Congress, as he looked at the Congressional representatives
on stage. Chu feels that within 4-5 months he can get money
out in a thoughtful and efficient way.
It
became clear that a coordination effort between the various
federal departments and the States was necessary, and Rendell
and Chu commenced dialogue on how to make that happen. It
is clear that the States and the federal cabinet Secretaries
are evolving as the points of coordination.
Mayor
Nutter asked how we could get all of this accomplished in
2009. The Vice President stated that the administration’s
goal was to streamline the regulatory process but not to sacrifice
thoughtfulness and transparency. He commented that what we
are attempting to accomplish has never been done before at
this scale and with this rapidity. He hoped that within the
next three weeks the new regulatory scheme would be refined.
Mark
Gaitlin mentioned that tax credits were good, but in today’s
economy no one really needed them. He also said that we should
look for transformational opportunities.
The
Vice President stated that the Act is meant to be an 18 month
stimulus, but it is married to the budget. The Act serves
as an initial platform to what will hopefully be a long-term
success. The Vice President said that we need to get it right.
He said that the administration would not raise expectations
that are not real and that the administration, through its
transparency, would not squander the money.
The
Secretary of Agriculture said that the rural communities should
not be forgotten, as a lot of emphasis was placed on urban
communities. He said that there were a lot of dollars allocated
in Agriculture that could be applied to rural issues and pointed
out that most farmers needed to get a job outside of the farm
because of the farmer’s income.
Secretary Chu said that transformational technology was also
a very important part of the equation and that increased funding
is proposed in this budget for NSF (my words).
The
Vice President stated that green jobs range from those for
folks with a GED to those with a PhD and that the entire spectrum
needed to be considered.
The
Secretary of Labor said that the Federal government was working
diligently with the State governments to get dollars out.
While the session wasn’t over, I had to leave.
Conclusions:
This administration in D.C. really wants to do the right thing,
in a bi-partisan way, to solve both the economic and jobs
problems of the U.S
They
realize that energy efficiency measures in buildings may be
the low hanging fruit, but there are other dimensions to job
creation which range from the GEDs to PhDs.
The
administration seems to be genuinely interested in listening
to anyone who has a suggestion and consider it.The administration
wants to act swiftly but thoughtfully. Egos seem to be in
check and solutions seem to be the focus.
A
systems approach is seemingly being employed in the solutions.
Transparency is the new world order.
The
administration is filled with a lot of truly thoughtful, intelligent
individuals.
The key will be implementation. Large-scale deployments are
never easy. As I sat there today, I wondered if the military
might have a role here—after all they frequently have
to do massive deployments rapidly. In fact, my mind wandered
to the perfect leader to oversee the massive deployment: Colin
Powell. His compatriot in the effort should be Ed Rendell.
All
in all, I’ve never felt so good about the approach out
government is taking. And I’m a free market guy. They
seem to have a very balanced view on the government’s
role and the need to stimulate the marketplace to operate
as only it can: to catalyze economic activity through large-scale
purchase agreements and appropriate regulations, inclusive
of the proposed carbon cap legislation, which were discussed
in today’s session.
We
should all feel very good and realize that if we have something
to contribute, now is the time to speak up.
|